August 20, 2014
3800 VerMaas Place, Suite 200
Lincoln, NE 68502 (map)
Phone: 402.475.7011
Toll Free: 800.714.3439

Overzealous Nursing Home Settles Immigration-Related Employment Discrimination Claim

In a case alleging that Isabella Geriatric Center (“IGC”) was too aggressive in asking immigrant workers to provide documentation, the nursing home has agreed to pay $14,500 in civil penalties to the United States; undergo training on the anti-discrimination provision of the INA; establish a back pay fund to compensate potential economic victims; revise its employment eligibility reverification policies; and be subject to monitoring of its employment eligibility verification practices for two years

IGC faced allegations that it was engaged in a pattern or practice of citizenship discrimination during the employment eligibility reverification process in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). IGC allegedly asked lawful permanent resident employees to present new cards when their Permanent Resident Cards expired. This is unnecessary because lawful permanent residents are authorized to work in the United States regardless of the expiration status of their cards. IGC also required lawful permanent residents to provide proof of U.S. citizenship if they became naturalized citizens.

Such practices would violate the INA, which became federal law in 1952. The INA’s anti-discrimination provision prohibits employers from placing additional documentary burdens on work-authorized employees during the employment eligibility verification process based on their citizenship status. Among other things, the statute prohibits citizenship status and national origin discrimination in hiring, firing or recruitment or referral for a fee, unfair documentary practices, retaliation and intimidation.

Updates to F-Tags in State Operations Manual

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has made revisions to twenty F-Tags in the State Operations Manual (SOM).  The changes reflect the Survey and Certification (S&C) policy memos issued from October 2003 through May 2014.

CMS states it is committed to revising and updating the SOM which includes clarifications to guidelines and changes to acceptable standards of practice as it relates to the regulatory guidance.  An advanced copy of the manual can be found here:  http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/Downloads/Survey-and-Cert-Letter-14-37.pdf.

Among the F-Tags updated are F208-Admission Policy, F221-Physical Restraints, and F441-Infection Control.  The changes to F208 are related to the January 8, 2004, S&C memo that sets out to clarify whether or not nursing homes may use promissory notes or deposit fees as conditions of admission.

CMS changed F221 to reflect the clarifications set out in the S&C memo of June 22, 2007, that clarifies the phrases “removes easily” and “freedom of movement”.  The updated guidance set out in F441 comes from four S&C memos dating from 2010 through 2013, and reflect clarifications to the use of insulin pens in the facilities, safe use of single dose/single use medications, point-of-care devices such as finger-prick devices and glucose meters, and laundry and infection control, specifically laundry detergents with/without antimicrobial claims, use of chlorine bleach, water temperatures and maintenance of laundry equipment.

Currently only the advance copy of the revisions available and CMS does indicate that the final version may differ slightly.

DAMAGES: What am I entitled to when injured due to someone’s negligence?

This is a valid question that’s often on the minds of victims dealing with personal injury.  An accident and injury can often be a life-changing event that places a person’s life in turmoil overnight. In Nebraska, the goal of damages is to put the injured person in the same position as he or she would have been had there been no injury.  While nothing can put the injured party back to exactly where they were prior to the injury, special and general damages can certainly help.

There are two types of damages available—economic and non-economic.  The amount of damages is solely up to the fact finder (Judge or Jury) and the Judge or Jury may consider the types of damages elaborated on below:

Economic Damages (or Special Damages)

  1. The reasonable value of medical (hospital, nursing, and similar) care and supplies reasonably needed by and actually provided to the victim(and reasonably certain to be needed and provided in the future);
  2. The (wages, salary, profits, reasonable value of the working time, business) the plaintiff has lost because of his/her (inability, diminished ability) to work;
  3. The reasonable value of the (earning capacity, business or employment opportunities) the plaintiff is reasonably certain to lose in the future;
  4. Reasonable Funeral costs;
  5. The reasonable value of the plaintiff’s loss of the use of his/her property;
  6. The reasonable value of the cost of repair or replacement of personal property;
  7. The reasonable cost of obtaining substitute domestic services.

Non-Economic Damages (or General Damages)

  1. The reasonable monetary value of the physical pain and mental suffering (and emotional distress) the plaintiff has experienced (and is reasonably certain to experience in the future);
  2. The reasonable monetary value of the inconvenience the plaintiff has experienced (and is reasonably certain to experience in the future);
  3. The reasonable monetary value of loss of society and companionship suffered by the plaintiff and reasonably certain to be suffered in the future;
  4. The reasonable monetary value of any injury to plaintiff’s reputation;
  5. The reasonable monetary value of any humiliation the plaintiff has experienced (and is reasonably certain to experience in the future);
  6. The plaintiff’s (husband’s, wife’s) loss of consortium. Consortium means those things to which a person is entitled by reason of the marriage relationship. Includes affection, love, companionship, comfort, assistance, moral support, and the enjoyment of (sexual, conjugal) relations.

In the determination of economic and non-economic damages, the fact finder must consider the nature and extent of the injury, including whether the injury is temporary or permanent, and whether any resulting disability is partial or total.

See Nebraska Jury instructions on damages; NJI2d Civ. 4.00; General instruction on Damages in a Tort Action – Economic and Noneconomic Damages.

Are You Making Sure Your Electronic Devices Are Secure?

  Do you know where your work laptop is?  Do you get work e-mail on your smartphone?  Are both sufficiently password protected?  What about your business associates?  Do you believe they sufficiently protect all protected health information they have in their possession?  It would probably be a good idea to take another look at your electronic device security because the theft of laptops and other devices continues to be the leading cause of information breaches.

   The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act requires healthcare providers to disclose to the government whenever the protected health information of at least 500 peoples has been compromised.  According to a June 11, 2014, report by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights for the years 2011 and 2012, the theft of devices such as laptops accounts for nearly half of those reports.  Some of the largest breaches involved business associates, including a 2011 incident in which nearly 5 million people were affected.

   To read the full report, click on the following link:  http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/administrative/breachnotificationrule/breachreport2011-2012.pdf

Light Therapy Treatment for Dementia Residents

Can adding particular kinds of light really soothe nursing home residents with dementia and improve their sleep and eating patterns? Recently published research findings certainly shed some light on that theory.

Fourteen nursing home residents with dementia were part of a study to answer that very question. The lights were put in their rooms for a period of four weeks, during which researchers used standardized tools to track sleep quality and duration, depression and agitation.  The investigators found that all significantly improved. Although subjective, the nursing staff also reported that the patients were eating better.

According to the principal author Mariana Figueiro, Ph.D., associate professor and Light and Health program director of the Lighting Research Center at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, NY, this is a simple, inexpensive, non-pharmacological treatment and the improvements in agitation and depression were very impressive.

The study used blue-white lights that were about 300 to 400 lux. According to government guidelines, this would be an appropriate light level for an office conference room. The lights had a color temperature of more than 9000 K—the range of a white LED bulb, according to information from Florida State University.

The light therapy works by acting on the body’s circadian responses (biological clock), the researchers stated.

Mississippi Case Highlights Issues of Resident Privacy

         In Mississippi, a man obtained access to the continuing care retirement community where a U.S. State Senator’s wife was being cared for due to dementia.  The man, Clayton Kelly, took an unauthorized photograph of the Senator’s wife.  He then used that photograph in a video that he used in his political blog to criticize the Senator.  Police are investigating how Kelly gained access to the facility, but Kelly’s wife claims that her husband had been given a visitor’s pass that allowed him onto the grounds and his attorney claims that the photograph was taken through an open door during regular visiting hours, and thus, Kelly did nothing wrong.  The whole situation has gained national attention because it involves a U.S. Senator in the middle of a primary campaign and the possibility that Kelly has some connection to the Senator’s main rival in that primary election.  However, there really is a lesson in all of this for nursing facilities.

         The Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 provides basic rights for residents of nursing homes.  Residents have the right to privacy and confidentiality and they have the right to dignity, respect, and freedom.  Mr. Kelly most certainly invaded her privacy and in the context of his politically motivated video violated her right to dignity and respect.  There is no doubt in that.  But what about the facility involved in this incident?  A spokesman for the facility did state that they do have security protocols in place; they patrol the grounds, they have a checkpoint where anyone entering must check in at, and they have other security measures in place. 

         Numerous examples like this are becoming more commonplace.  Is there anything more a facility can do to protect their residents in circumstances such as these?  Given we live in an age where everyone has a cell phone and almost all of them have a camera, it can be quite daunting to consider the options.  To ensure complete privacy, a facility would have to require visitors to hand over such personal property upon entering a facility.  However, short of that, facilities can and should consider policies prohibiting possession of cameras or other recording devices, by staff and prominently warning the visiting public that unauthorized photographs or videos of residents (other than family members) is forbidden.  Staff should be instructed to kindly remind visitors of these privacy rules and to report non-compliance promptly to management.

Governor Vetoes LB 916

   On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Governor Dave Heineman vetoed LB 916, which would have eliminated the requirements that nurse practitioners enter into integrated practice agreements with physicians.  They would still be required to work collaboratively with physicians and other care providers.  The bill would have changed provisions to credentialing and regulation of nurse practitioners as well and would have put into place a transition to practice agreement.  In order to practice the nurse practitioner would have needed this transition to practice agreement or had 2,000 hours of practice under such an agreement in order to work in the state. 

   The bill was introduced by Sen. Sue Crawford of Bellevue.  Sen. Crawford stated that studies showed that nurse practitioners “practice in a safe, effective and cost-effective manner in several states.”  In testimony given to the Legislature’s Health and Human Services Committee, nurses stated that it can be difficult for nurse practitioners to find physicians with whom they could enter into integrated practice agreements with, especially in rural areas.

   In vetoing the bill, Gov. Heineman along with Chief Medical Officer Dr. Joseph Acierno expressed concern for patient safety stating that adequate clinical experience was necessary.  Gov. Heineman stated that in the future there would be a time to move forward in giving nurse practitioners additional independence, but LB 916 went too far too quickly.  The governor stated had the bill required 4,000 hours of clinical experience he would have signed it. 

   LaDonna Hart, President of the Nebraska Nurse Practitioners, states that finding a doctor who will sign the needed agreement is becoming harder and harder for nurse practitioners.  Other nurse practitioners state that this veto could limit efforts in attracting nurse practitioners to the state.  Co-Presidents of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Angela Golden and Ken Miller, weighed in on the governor’s veto stating it was a “missed opportunity by the state to allow Nebraska patients to receive full and direct access to nurse practitioners while improving the efficiency of the state’s health care workforce.”  They further stated that LB 916 would have addressed the problem of primary care and mental health provider shortages seen in the state had Gov. Heineman signed the bill. 

 

Dick Knudsen Elected Cooper Foundation Honorary Trustee

Knudsen Law Firm’s own Dick Knudsen has been elected as Cooper Foundation honorary trustee. Read more about it at  Journal Star–Richard A. (Dick) Knudsen

 

 

Significantly Reduced Antipsychotic Med-Use in Long-Term Care Facilities

A reduction of more than 15% of antipsychotic medication use in Long-term care facilities has been reached through a large-scale initiative, according to a new report from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

In 2012, the National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care in Nursing Homes began with the primary goal of reducing the prevalence of antipsychotic prescribing for dementia care by 15%. The goal was met in the fourth quarter of 2013, according to an interim CMS report. The national prevalence of antipsychotic use among long-stay nursing home residents has decreased 15.1% from the fourth quarter of 2011, the report states. The overall antipsychotic prescribing rate for this population was 20.2% in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Every state has achieved a decline in antipsychotic use and the CMS numbers affirm a progressive decline.  The goal to change the long-term care culture and reduce antipsychotic med-use  has been the implementation of team-based, person-centered care.

Now that its initial goal has been realized, CMS will set a new one for 2014, according to the report. The report also notes that some states already have set ambitious objectives, including California’s target of a 30% reduction in antipsychotic prevalence.

Richard Knudsen Elected as Honorary Trustee of Cooper Foundation

Richard A  Knudsen

The Cooper Foundation announced that Richard (Dick) Knudsen has been elected to serve as honorary trustee of the board of trustees. He was selected for his long and valuable service to the Cooper Foundation. Mr. Knudsen first started serving the Cooper Foundation in 1950 when he joined the law firm of Beghtol & Rankin. Once Mr. Knudsen made partner, the law firm became Beghtol, Mason, Knudsen, & Dickeson and which would eventually become Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott. Mr. Kundsen retired from practice in 1994 but still served the Cooper Foundation.

Dick Knudsen continued the law firm’s representation of the Cooper Foundation which was started by Max Beghtol in the 1920s.  It was then continued by J. Lee Rankin, John Mason, as well as Wally Richardson.  J. Lee Rankin was also elected as an honorary trustee of the board of directors in 1984.

The Cooper Foundation supports individuals through education, human services, the arts, humanities and the environment. The Foundation gives grants to non-profit organizations primarily Lincoln and Lancaster County.

Client Testimonial:

Jeanelle paid close attention to all the details and explained all the legal jargon to us so we were able to understand what was happening. We were very happy with her services and will always recommend her to anyone else that we hear of needing legal services.

A Satisfied Knudsen Client